Sunday, October 20, 2013

The Crucible

I wrote these "mini-essays" in response to questions about possible themes for the play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller.


1. What is the significance of the title?

In The Crucible, the challenges faced by the characters grow more dramatic and losses become more ruinous as the tension rises. The situation “heats up”, giving rise to the name of the play, The Crucible. Characters such as John Proctor and Giles Corey are continually horrified by the injustices upon the best of their neighbors, such as Rebecca Nurse, because of the fear created by the incriminating stories of a few girls. The tests faced by characters are not only external: they are internal. John Proctor has to mentally battle his past sin of adultery. Because of this, more pressure is put on him to be “Christian” as others, like Governor Danforth, interrogate him in the final scenes of the play. John, not wanting to be hypocritical, finds it difficult to both unveil the truth about the supposed witches while not unveiling his past acts. In the end, he tries to use his act of adultery with Abigail Williams to compromise the integrity of her testimony against the citizens of Salem. This event shows how far this war in John's head raged. The problems in Salem spread because of the unwillingness of those in positions of authority to attribute mundane happenings to natural causes. Governor Danforth is unwilling to change his ruling even when supplied with blunt truths about the accusers, such as the untrustworthiness of the Thomas Putnam and Abigail stealing Reverend Parris's money.



2. How does fear fuel conformity?

Throughout The Crucible, the townspeople of Salem conform to fear because of social pressures. The group of girls who accuse others of witchcraft are originally threatened into that position by Abigail Williams. Abby tells them of the death of her parents at the hands of natives which gives her a way to frighten the other girls into obeying her. After this, Abigail later places the blame on Tituba, a slave from Barbados. Because Tituba could not defend herself in any way, she admits to signing a contract with the Devil, but she also names a few others who she saw with the Devil. She does this because it will lessen the blame on her by spreading the source of evil onto others. When the group of girls threatened by Abigail sees this, they name others such as Sarah Good, Goody Osburn, and Bridget Bishop in order to excuse themselves. This makes the girls appear as victims of evil instead of as evil-doers. It creates a shield for them, making them all impervious to future attacks on their name and integrity. Instead of just admitting to their actions at the beginning of the play, they throw coal into the fire of fear and cowardice by spreading the blame. The consequences for the actions might not have been as extreme for the other townsfolk if they had just been brave enough to tell the truth. The fear first placed upon the girls by Abigail Williams erased all chances of reason prevailing and spread the fear throughout Salem like leaves spreading the initial sparks of a forest fire.


3. How does language create reality?

Language can create a reality when the language is more desirable than the actual reality. The chain of lies initiated by the girls in Salem quickly leaves the original truths of the play far behind; it is forgotten that he girls were dancing in the woods when they shouldn't have, that characters such as Rebecca Nurse are righteous and trustworthy, and that Abigail Williams deserted when her goal, being with John Proctor, was dashed against the rocks with his condemnation of the authoritative figures of the town. All of these truths are ignored because their acknowledgment would not be beneficial to characters such as Danforth, Abigail, Thomas Putnam, and Reverend Parris. Danforth would not be able to exercise his authoritative powers to the desired extent if he had taken all the evidence into consideration. The trials would have been shorter and less important in written history. Abigail's name would not be “white in the village” and she would not be able to be with John Proctor if she had not drawn attention to the oddities that she called witchcraft of others. Thomas Putnam and Reverend Parris wanted the land and property of others; they supported the accusations against Giles Corey and John Proctor because they increased the chances of them gaining land and wealth. The language supplied by these accusing characters provided combined with the judicial power of Danforth and the other judges gave no chance to the characters seeking real justice and truth. Their language created the reality that they thought was most beneficial to them.



4. What is the significance of a name?

The value of one's name in The Crucible is why the characters choose to either place the blame on others or take the blame. When Abigail Williams retaliates with the phrase, “My name is white in the village,” she is indicating the importance she places on her standing among others. She is willing to accuse innocent bystanders of crimes punishable by death only to protect her name. All of the characters in the play who accuse others to excuse themselves show how they put the value of their own name over the lives of their own neighbors. Even the people who do not put their names before others show extreme concern over the defiling of their name; John Proctor is the example for this. In the final act of the play, John is very unwilling to physically write down his name to testify of sins that he did not commit. After being continually informed of the penalty, which is death, for not signing his name, he signs; but in a last-second decision, John decides his name is worth more than his life. He rips up the paper and argues that he judges witness that he signed the paper was good enough evidence. Rather than be known as a man who sinned and repented and have the association of evil passed down through his family, John stands up for himself and defends his reputation as an honest man. He, like Abigail and the other accusers, puts a name before a life, but, unlike the accusers who protect their names by sacrificing others' lives, it is a name that he is protecting by sacrificing his life.

No comments:

Post a Comment